I posted that purely for amusement. I've never seen nor heard of an IHADCB macro, as of z/OS 2.4. Did you mean one should just create it?
I have no real issue with any of the mapping macros; their various styles and conventions are understandable given the decades of history. sas On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 9:06 AM Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> > Anyone ever notice that macro DCBD produces a DSECT named IHADCB, and that > macro IHADCBE produces a DSECT named DCBE? Go figure. > </snip> > > Did you "figure" that you might be doing something wrong that led you to > think that that is strange? > You should probably be using IHADCB which internally invokes DCBD. Then we > have "macro IHADCB produces a DSECT named IHADCB". > > Then you can choose to think about why some produce a DSECT without the > component prefix and some with, as Charles observed. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
