was a the dataset renamed possibly? not created, if so there should be an SMF 60-64 breadcrumb I believe to see if it was renamed from another dataset ?
Carmen Vitullo ----- Original Message ----- From: "willie bunter" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 10:50:24 AM Subject: Re: SMF PUZZLE Roger, I looked for SMF 118 but nothing turned up. Thanks for the suggestion. On Sunday, August 25, 2019, 10:45:43 a.m. UTC, Roger Lowe <[email protected]> wrote: On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 17:29:30 +0000, willie bunter <[email protected]> wrote: >Good Day, >I am trying to find the user/job which created a dsn. I run my trustworthy SMF >job which looks for recids 05 14 15 17 18 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 136 139 163. >The job showed the job which read the dsn & deleted it but it doesn't show who >or which job created it.According to the LISTCAT the creation date of the dsn >was Thursday Aug. 22. I read the SMF tape for the previous week and subsequent >days including Aug 22 & 23. >I was thinking if the dsn was created by a FTP or an UNIX upload process which >may not be trapped by SMF >Any thoughts? Any suggestions > If you think it might have been an FTP process, you will need to check out the SMF 118 records. Roger ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
