On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:47:42 +0100, Charles Mills wrote: > ... >FWIW, POSIX(ON) is not a problem. "My" code all runs POSIX(ON). > What motivation is there for POSIX(OFF)? Compatibility with lost source code?
>-----Original Message----- >From: Allan Kielstra >Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 4:41 PM > >We are listening! >https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/xlCC++V231ForZOsV23?OpenDocument > >This is a web deliverable that co-exists (does not overwrite) the existing xlC >compiler. I have personally used it to develop C++ code with initializer >lists, emplacements in collections, lambdas, variadic template classes and >other more modern features. > >One thing I should point out. For any non-trivial program, the resulting >executable will require POSIX(ON). Also, you should compile an entire >application with the new compiler or the old one. (The object models are not >the same.) -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
