Forgot to say that all the variations were used copying the example Thanks
> On Oct 30, 2019, at 12:44 AM, David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Joe, > > You should know the answer to your question because it is clearly documented > that you can > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ceeam00/piniint.htm. > > This thread has been meandering on a bit. Why don't you just copy the example > from the book which does an INIT_MAIN/CALL_MAIN and get back to us if you > have any problems. We have used > CEEPIPI extensively in our products and it's not a difficult service to use. > CELQPIPI is just the 64-bit analog of CEEPIPI so you should be able to get > something working in a couple of hours using the > example -> > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ceeam00/coreyex.htm. > > >> On 2019-10-30 2:44 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote: >> In light of the recent posts >> >> Would anybody know if I can use INIT_MAIN using CELQPIPI to initialize a 64 >> bit CELQPRLG assembler which calls a 64 bit C DLL export >> >> >> Thanks >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
