> And you needf (sic) one more indirection. No, I don't need another level of indirection.
> See the page lately cited by Tom Marchant: That page agrees with what I wrote, and does not show an extraneous level of indirection. It differs only in drawing boxes around things to clarify the structure, and in showing the X'80' at offset 0 rather than just describing it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 6:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AUTHPGM in IKJTSOxx On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:49:29 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: > ... >You're losing track of your indirect addresses: >R1 -> Paramaeter list > +0 -> H'length',C'characters' > +4 Doesn't exist for jobstep. > And you needf one more indirection. See the page lately cited by Tom Marchant: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieaa600/parmpm.htm >The end-of-list flag is X'80' at offset 0 in the parameter list. > Which is a pointer, not the PARM value. >PARM='(' results in R1 -> Parameter list > +0 -> H'1,C'(' >with an X'0" flag at offset 0 in the list, not in the parameter list address >in R1. > Yes, but that's a list of addresses, not the parameter values. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
