ahem! I meant to say CVTUSER, a very different field from CVTUSR :-) On Sat, 30 Nov 2019, 15:17 Rupert Reynolds, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whatever happened to CVTUSR? Back in the 1990s we used to have (from > memory) a started task that came up briefly during IPL and it allocated > storage (I forget what key, but read only in the general case) for a vector > table, pointed CVTUSR at that, and then it stopped itself. > > So if I was (say) at Nasty Wet Monster Bank, it would point CVTUSR at the > NMVT, which we could use for anything within reason. > > Ruz > > On Sat, 30 Nov 2019, 13:56 Peter Relson, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Lennie wrote: >> <snip> >> Is this intended to be undocumented? >> Is there a published list of the existing assignments of those slots? >> </snip> >> >> To the first: it is documented. To the extent appropriate, that being >> commentary in the data area book and showing the fields as "PI". >> To the second: no. >> >> It is up to each ISV whether they want to make known what slot they are >> using (and up to them to document whatever they feel appropriate about >> such use). >> >> Peter Relson >> z/OS Core Technology Design >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
