Yes discussions have been initiated đŸ˜€

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019, 11:59 PM Parwez Hamid <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Have you actually asked IBM how they can help meet your out of country DR
> requirements?
>
> The CoD offering has been around since the G3 Servers. Started life as EBU
> (Emergency Backup), later became CBU and got further enhanced with CIU. CPE
> etc etc. All these changes/evolution were driven by customer requirements.
> So if the current offerings don't meet your requirements, no harm in asking
> IBM.
>
> Regards
>
> Parwez Hamid​
>
> ________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf
> of Laurence Chiu <[email protected]>
> Sent: 29 November 2019 20:02
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: OOCoD experiences?
>
> Understand that. But IBM should recognize that some organisations might
> want an out of region DR site and not want to buy a mainframe with half
> their production MIPS that's hardly ever going to be used. CBU is fine in
> country but for some reason but outside country.
>
> After all their DS8K Copy Services Manager provides replication support
> with Global Mirror.
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019, 9:40 AM Parwez Hamid <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > The reason for the CBU capability to upgrade to any capacity with the
> > limits of the physical installed capacity is to enable customers to 'CBU'
> > multiple systems e.g. Customer might have 3 systems and only one DR
> system.
> > As long as the DR system has sufficient capacity, they have the
> possibility
> > of bringing up all LPARs on the 3 systems. Normally when customers plan
> for
> > DR they tend to do so for critical and important business workload. Sys
> > progs sandpits and test systems tend to get the chop. Again it all
> depends
> > on the 'nature' of the disaster at the primary DC.
> >
> > On/Off CoD is generally meant to cater for 'peak' or unexpected workloads
> > e.g. month/qtr/year end processing or even sales on a Black Friday :-0
> > Hence the limit of 2 times of the purchased capacity.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Parwez Hamid​
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf
> > of Laurence Chiu <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 28 November 2019 18:48
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: OOCoD experiences?
> >
> > Thanks. I looked at the IBM documentation
> >
> >
> >
> https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg28c04fa949ae402ed85258194006c7b9b&aid=1
> >
> > Not an easy read by any means and it seems the 72 hours limit on CPE
> won't
> > work for our environment.
> >
> > So the only option appears to be OOCoD.
> >
> > Interesting for CBU you can upgrade from a base machine to any model so
> > long as it does not require adding more hardware but for OOCoD you can
> only
> > go up 100%
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019, 12:49 AM Parwez Hamid <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Adding my 2 cents worth:
> > >
> > > Within the Capcity on Demand (CoD) offering for Z, there are a number
> of
> > > options available for different types of situations. Some have already
> > been
> > > mentioned. A couple of useful docs:
> > >
> > >   1.  IBM Redbook. Capacity on Demand SG24-7504. Almost 10 years old.
> > > Apart from some 'enhancements' to the offering (mainly to do with
> > > pricing/maintenance charges and entitlement to carry foward 'options'
> > when
> > > upgrading to a newer Z system) and adding of the System Recovery Boost
> > > (SRB) option for the z15, the main content is still relevant.
> > >   2.  zSystem Capacity On Demand User’s Guide  -  SC28-6943
> > >
> > > All the CoD options i.e. CBU, CIU, CPE, On/Off CoD and SRB have T&Cs.
> Key
> > > point about the contracts is that some may be localised for an
> individual
> > > country. In addition, different CoD records have different time
> > > limits/expiration dates.
> > >
> > > Some additional points:
> > >
> > >   1.  Its a given that to activate the additional capacity, the
> physical
> > > resource is already available in the system.
> > >   2.  CPE has been mentioned. CPE is temporary access to capacity
> > intended
> > > to replace capacity lost within the enterprise due to a planned event
> > such
> > > as a facility upgrade or system relocation. CPE is similar to CBU in
> that
> > > it is intended to replace lost capacity; however, it differs in its
> scope
> > > and intent. Where CBU addresses disaster recovery scenarios that can
> take
> > > up to three months to remedy, CPE is intended for short-duration events
> > > lasting up to three days, maximum.
> > >   3.  On/Off CoD. On/Off CoD is available for up to twice the
> ‘purchased’
> > > capacity of a given machine.  On/Off CoD upgrades are allowed for any
> > > processor configuration, up to the limit, as long as the number or
> > capacity
> > > level of the processors is increased.  Upgrades that decrease the
> number
> > or
> > > the capacity level of processors is not allowed.
> > >
> > > In his response below, Tim mentions Instant Recovery. This is the same
> as
> > > System Recovery Boost (SRB). A few poinst about this option:
> > >
> > >   1.  The name can be bit mis-leading. The 'instant' applies to the
> > > capability of ACTIVATING additional CAPACITY during/after an IPL -
> > planned
> > > or unplanned..
> > >   2.  This is limited to a short duration i.e. minutes/hours rather
> than
> > > days!
> > >   3.  Some the documentation states 'speed'. Remember, this refers to
> the
> > > 'speed' of bringing down/up of the OS and sub-systems. This is done by
> > > ACTIVATING ADDITIONAL capacity and not by changing the GHz of the
> > processor.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Parwez Hamid​
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on
> behalf
> > > of Timothy Sipples <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: 28 November 2019 09:14
> > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: OOCoD experiences?
> > >
> > > Jerry Whitteridge wrote:
> > > >We looked at this before I moved to IBM and had
> > > >to rule it out as the Hardware side only bills you
> > > >for the Capacity by the day activated (e.g. Use OOCoD
> > > >for 7 days and get charged for the 7 days at higher
> > > >capacity) BUT software is billed by the month so you
> > > >get the full month at the higher capacity even if you
> > > >only turned on OOCoD for an hour.
> > >
> > > First of all, what you describe was never true, not the way you
> describe
> > it
> > > anyway.
> > >
> > > 1. Sub-capacity Monthly License Charge (MLC) IBM software was/is based
> on
> > > the monthly peak *four* hour rolling average (4HRA). A *one hour* OOCoD
> > > activation is not four hours, so it was/is mathematically impossible
> for
> > > your MLC to report a 4HRA equal to or even particularly near the total
> > MSU
> > > capacity inclusive of the one hour OOCoD activation.
> > >
> > > 2. "One-Time Charge" (OTC) IBM software, a.k.a. IPLA software, allows
> > daily
> > > OOCoD pricing -- "per MSU day."
> > >
> > > 3. You were/are also allowed to set softcapping on machines across
> OOCoD
> > > activation(s), and with some potential "white space" (free) capacity
> > > utilization. Sub-capacity reports will never report above the
> softcap(s).
> > >
> > > Laurence Chiu wrote:
> > >
> > > >I think there might be a software deal in the mix also based
> > > >on Tailor Fit Pricing but it's good to know all the ramifications.
> > >
> > > Yes, that's right. With Tailored Fit Pricing peak MSUs (4HRA or
> > otherwise)
> > > no longer matter as such.
> > >
> > > There's also now Instant Recovery on IBM z15 machines, with z/OS System
> > > Recovery Boost. There is no software reported capacity associated with
> > > legal/valid z/OS System Recovery Boost(s).
> > >
> > > >CBU won't work because the site is out of country.
> > >
> > > Does your workload qualify for Capacity for Planned Events (CPE), and
> are
> > > CPE's T&C compatible with cross-border requirements?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Timothy Sipples
> > > IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM Z & LinuxONE
> > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > E-Mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to