I have debugged amode 64 under TEST 

Greg Price I think Wrote an LG subcommand ( it’s on a cbttape file ) to display 
64 bit gpr 

Mark Zelden wrote a Rexx exec display storage including above the bar 

I abended when in my code I tried to access 64 bit storage that I hadn’t  
allocated 

I have under test received control in my recovery routine when I abended under 
test 



> On Jan 20, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Steve Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't use TSO TEST or TEST Auth any more. I use zXDC when it is available.
> 
> So, that said, does the TSO commands manual for the level of z/OS you are 
> running with, which contains the TSO TEST command doc, say that it can handle 
> 64bit addresses?
> 
> If not, or the SYSPROG TSO Commands (I think that is where TSO TEST Auth is 
> documented -- but I haven't used it since the mid-90s) -- does it say that it 
> can handle 64 bit addressing?
> 
> If they don't say that, I'm willing to bet you a donut that you ABENDed in a 
> TSO TEST module.
> 
> If you want to check it out, set a SLIP and look at that dump and see 
> who/what had control when that ABEND happened.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve Thompson
> 
>> On 1/20/20 11:26 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>> Hi
>>  I issued a ESTAEX in AMODE 31
>>  Later I Scheduled an SRB which returned ok. I then tried to access amode 64
>> erroneously being in AMODE 64 and got S0C4 pic 11
>>  I did this all while running under TESTAUTH
>>  TEST issued a message informing me of the abend
>>  However my recovery routine didn't get control (I had a break point right in
>> the beginning +0)
>>  I re-read chapter 18 in authorized Assembler guide (providing recovery ) and
>> saw no reason why my recovery routine should not get control
>>  Unless TEST issues its own recovery and didn't percolate to me
>>  But at this point every routine I enter I issue estaex and estaex 0 upon
>> exit
>>  And TEST does give me control when I mess up
>>  It doesn't seem like switching to AMODE 64 and invoking an SRB (which had an
>> FRR) in the interim should negate my recovery ( I also had no BAKR during
>> his sequence)
>>  Thanks
>>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to