A note on creating a recovery routine (ESTAE or ESTAEX).  If you create an 
ESTAE in a subroutine and use BAKR/PR to get to and return from that 
subroutine, the ESTAE gets deleted by PR.  Another programmer wrote an 
INITIALIZE subroutine where the ESTAE was created, only I was never going to 
the ESTAE and I couldn't figure out why for the longest time.

Chris Blaicher
Technical Architect
Syncsort, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 2:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ATTACH and IARV64

[ External - This message has originated from an External Source.  Please use 
proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or 
responding to this email ]

So if task B frees tasks A storage and it’s not shared I would get a B37 type 
error ?

A related question if I load a program in task A task B can use it access and 
invoke it And even use it as a ( recovery routine just trying to figure out why 
recovery routine didn’t work )

Thanks 





> On Jan 21, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I believe that you have a misunderstanding of what "shared subpools" are.
> 
> Any task in an address space has addressability to private storage of 
> any other task. Nothing special is required for this.
> 
> A "shared subpool" is one where those sharing the subpool can directly 
> allocate and free the storage and the storage lives until the last 
> user of the subpool (which would be the initial parent task doing the ATTACH 
> SHSP) ends.
> The storage is not freed when the subtasks end.
> 
> There is no real concept of "subpools" in 64bit as the area is not 
> suballocated by the system.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:19:17 -0500 Joseph Reichman 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> :>Under to 2GB bar the attach has a parameter SHSPV parameter to share 
> storage :>or subpool with another task in the same address space :> :> 
> :> :>Above the 2GB I am assuming I would need to do a GETSHARED 
> request ?
> 
> --
> Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> 
> http://www.dissensoftware.com
> 
> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
> 
> 
> Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, 
> you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
> 
> I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, 
> especially those from irresponsible companies.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to