Really! They even go so far as to say you can abbreviate COPYGRP as CG and COPYGROUP as CP. They could just have one section and list three abbreviations (in itself an excessive number).
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 1:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Two related alias entry address questions On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 12:37:31 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >"Getting the aliases" is not an issue; getting the alias's entry point offset >is the issue. > >I am copying to a PDS because the program objects are in a PDSE but what I >want at the other end is a PDS. > Relink with INCLUDE -ATTR. Module by module. Ouch. I suspect this is used under-the-covers by IEBCOPY PDS<-->PDSE. >I will try COPYGRP and COPYGROUP. What's the difference? The description is >word for word the same. > Maintenance of the doc would be less tedious and more robust if one merely cited the other. And you would have been spared the research you prudently performed. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
