Or write a subsytem interface; dymically allocating a pipe is probably the 
better option.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
John McKown <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 1:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Scripting REXX thought -- inspiration or insanity?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:16 AM scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote:

> Shmuel , you and John both have a valid point.  Rexx isnt meant to be an
> IDE as far as I know.
> But certain CLI(command line interface) options are desirable, since many
> functions nowadays are cli drive from Linux or Unix ...of some sort.
>
> If memory serves me you could write an Rexx function package, to accomplish
> what John is speaking about.  I would have to look.
>

I was think of a "command processor" aka some program, which would parse
the command line, accumulate all the "-e" values & place them in what the
REXX documentation on IRXEXEC calls a "in-storage control block". I have
done some minor reading about this and the I/O processing for the input
data is non-trivial. I was hoping to be able to supply an I/O address to a
routine. But apparently you must supply DD names. Rats. That really
complicates things in a UNIX environment. I guess that in UNIX, I could
make some pipes in the UNIX filesystem and do a DYNALLOC to allocate them
so that I/O on the pipes is done via some subtasks. {blech}



>
> BTW - OT - be safe and stay well both of you.
>
> Scott
>
>
>

--
People in sleeping bags are the soft tacos of the bear world.
Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to