On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:59:06 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> It's the UNIX tradition.
https colon//www.goodreads.com/quotes/353571-a-foolish-consistency-is-the-hobgoblin-of-little-minds-adored The operant qualifier is "foolish". >Can you pipe the output of a Unix command to IRXJCL? shell syntax? > Not shell, but with Rexx: SYSCALL pipe; BPXWDYN( 'alloc dd(SYSTSIN) ...' ); ATTCHMVS; and, yes, that's SYSTSIN, not SYSEXEC. >Is there a compelling need to do that? > No. >So does foo | rexx bar, but neither one treats the output of foo as Rexx code > With a little shell redirection, it's easy with Regina. > It makes most sense if someone else writes that wrapper. > With a little shell redirection, it's easy with Regina. >You are someone. > But not someone *else*. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
