On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 14:33, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's the answer to your question: the manual is correct but fails to connect > the dots. The dynamic concatenation *does* remove the > association of the other ddnames, but it does not delete the record that > there had previously been such an association, so when > you deconcatenate it is able to reestablish the association. If, instead, you > deallocate, then there is no longer a record of the > previous allocation.
So is that record of the previous allocation kept in some private/undocumented place by allocation, or do TIOT entries remain in place (perhaps flagged somehow) and provide all the necessary info? Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
