Some scrutiny of the DFHSM activity logs to see if the same old datasets are failing to be processed each time, may not go amiss. That sort of stuff can build up over time, and can accumulate to become a considerable overhead every time automatic functions run.
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 06:50, Brian Westerman <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, HSM is a bit of a hog, so it shouldn't be set to run above your > loved ones. It's more important than batch or TSO, but not CICS, > DB/2|ADASBAS|ORACLE, TCP, VTAM or anybody else important. > > STCLOW is a good choice so long as everything "important" is above it. > > Brian > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
