On Wed, 22 Apr 2020, 19:29 Seymour J Metz, <[email protected]> wrote: > True, but as an amusing side note there were Y2K bugs that were not worth > fixing, like displaying the year as 100 instead of 00. Unfortunately, most > were not like that. >
And thus was born the "Year 19100 bug" :-) Rupert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
