I've made a lot of use of DBSYNC over the years. But, since I made doing the Software Upgrade path, I don't have a new RACF db to compare with.
Examining the RACFLIST job turned out to be simpler than I expected. Also, not nearly as much new stuff, as say there was going from z/OS 1.3 to 2.1 or OS/390 to z/OS > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On > Behalf Of retired mainframer > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2020 1:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Serverpac job RACFDLTA > > If you don't get any better ideas, DBSYNC from the RACF Goodies page might > help > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On > > Behalf Of Gibney, Dave > > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2020 11:01 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Serverpac job RACFDLTA > > > > I am installing the archived z/OS 2.3 Serverpac on a z/OS 2.1 system. > When I tried > > to merge my z/OS 2.1 configuration into the 2.3 configuration, I > > received > a message > > that the old was created by a level of the Installation dialogue too > > old > to merge. So I > > didn't get a RACFDLTA job generated. > > Given that the RACFDRV/RACFTGT jobs are 1. Not at all a good idea > > to > run as > > delivered. 2. A real pain to manually evaluate. 3. Even the RACLIST > > job is > going to be > > tedious to evaluate. > > I was wondering if someone could provide an example RACFDLTA job > > hat I > could > > muck and see if I can get some useful info from? > > > > cross posted to IBM-MAIN and RACF-L > > > > Dave Gibney > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
