> If there's a complaint about something I wrote, OK, fine, but how about
making sure it's a complaint about something I wrote? :-)

You wrote several things. Different responses referred to different things you 
wrote. I don't recall anybody claiming that you can't have a long userid in 
instream data. What they have claimed, accurately, is that you can't have a 
long userid in your JCL.

Now for a technical question. If some component validates a long userid via 
LDAP, creates an ACEE for the user and copies a jobstream to the Internal 
Reader, will the job inherit the correct authentication credentials? 


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of 
Timothy Sipples [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 1:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mainframe user ID length

Tom Marchant wrote:
>What is your point? The contents of in-stream data is not part of
>JCL, any more than the contents of some other data set referenced
>in a DD statement is.

Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>There's a qualitative difference.  The Reader or Converter must
>inspect every record of an in-stream data set, and the Interpreter
>or Access Method must scan for substitutable symbols.  Not so with
>some other data set.
>And the in-line data appear in the SUBMITted member commonly called
>JCL.

If anyone still cares, here's what I actually wrote:
>If you want to pass a longer user ID to something else
>using a different vocabulary, JCL isn't going to stop you.
>Example: Try using JCL to invoke z/OS's FTP client to transfer a file to
>an arbitrary FTP server, specifying a user ID longer than 8 characters.
>Can it be done? Of course it can; it's perfectly routine. You just don't
>use JES-related syntax, that's all.

100% true!

If there's a complaint about something I wrote, OK, fine, but how about
making sure it's a complaint about something I wrote? :-)

Who says mainframe professionals aren't the most friendly, helpful
individuals willing to go the extra mile (or kilometer) to help solve user
problems? Why, they never say "Can't be done!" and refuse to help. That's
just ridiculous. :-) :-)

....It's usually not this platform that's getting in the way of progress.
Here's yet another such case. For over two decades (closer to three) we've
been submitting JCL to JES2 or JES3 to do such (awful) things as sending
and receiving files via FTP, with absolutely no trouble specifying a user
ID that's longer than 8 characters. We haven't even given it a second
thought, really. JCL hasn't and isn't standing in your way here,
obviously. Since the OS/390 days you've been able to present a X.509
digital certificate to RACF in lieu of a user ID for authentication and
authorization. These features aren't state secrets. If you have z/OS, you
have in-stream data in JCL. (How long has that been?) You also have the
IBM Directory Server for z/OS. If you have the z/OS Security Server, you
have RACF client certificate authentication. If you don't like maximum 8
character user IDs, OK, don't trouble your users with them! There are
other viable, sensible approaches available -- handed to you, really.
Plenty of organizations are already using them and aren't troubling their
users with maximum 8 character IDs.

So let's cut the nonsense and start leading progress rather than
inhibiting it, OK? A few more "Wow, that's pretty interesting!" remarks
would be welcome. (Thanks, Bob.) Deal? And sure, if there's something
missing that you want or need, by all means ask (IBM RFE).

OK, back to problem solving....

- - - - - - - - - -
Timothy Sipples
I.T. Architect Executive
Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
IBM Z & LinuxONE
- - - - - - - - - -
E-Mail: [email protected]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to