I don't believe I have seen a description of their
problem. We are planning on an install of zVM 5.2 for
a new client. Is there a description of the problem
available?

Thks,
 Bill J.

P.S. Some of us are not afforded the opportunity to
attend SHARE.

--- Kurt Acker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The code for this was written as a circumvention and
> is still under 
> review.  As initial performance testing has been
> very positive, it may 
> wind up becoming the official fix, however it is
> still to early for us to 
> make that decision.  No matter what, the fix test
> can be obtained by 
> opening a PMR (this allows us to track anyone with
> the fixtest, keeping 
> everyone with the most current information regarding
> its status).  Thanks 
> and Best Regards,
> 
> Kurt Acker 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Peter Rothman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> <[email protected]>
> 03/27/2006 10:40 AM
> Please respond to
> The IBM z/VM Operating System
> <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> To
> [email protected]
> cc
> 
> Subject
> Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0 problem
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> We are also planning to upgrade to z/VM 520 within
> the next few weeks - 
> any
> idea when the fix will close so it can be ordered.
> 
> 
> 
>  
>              Martha McConaghy 
>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>              DU>                                    
>                    To 
> 
>              Sent by: The IBM         
> [email protected] 
>              z/VM Operating                         
>                    cc 
> 
>              System 
>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                      
>               Subject 
> 
>              ARK.EDU>                  Update on
> z/VM 5.2.0 problem 
>  
>  
>              03/27/2006 10:25 
>              AM 
>  
>  
>              Please respond to 
>                The IBM z/VM 
>              Operating System 
>              <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>                  ARK.EDU> 
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Those of you who attended our z/VM 5.2.0 Early
> Experiences presentation
> at SHARE know that Marist had some serious problems
> that forced us to back
> out our upgrade.   An APAR has been opened on the
> problem, VM63968.  Not
> long after SHARE, another customer also had a
> similar problem, so it is
> not isolated to Marist.
> 
> This past weekend, we tested a fix for the problem
> and I'm glad to say 
> that
> it appears to work.  We were able to run for 6 hours
> without the problem
> reoccuring.  (The problem involves a serious
> deadlock situation that can
> bring all of CP to its knees.)  We are planning to
> bring 5.2.0 up for a
> longer
> period of time during Easter break.
> 
> Martha
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to