We have to
be whiney demanding. Having too many
fall back events hurts our job stability, which is infinitely more critical
than the stability of the system.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-----Original
Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:06
PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0
problem
> Yes, there
are a *few* sites that are having stability problems,
Uh huh. And they're the whiney sites. That's right -- you know who you
are!! :-)
Mike (having a "Chuckie
moment") Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are
mine alone, not my employer's.
"The IBM
z/VM Operating System" <[email protected]> wrote on 03/28/2006
03:52:02 PM:
> On Tuesday, 03/28/2006 at 11:05 PST, "Austin, Alyce (CIV)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because of the "growing pains" with 5.2, is support for
z/VM 4.4 going
> > to be extended beyond 9/06?
>
> Alyce, what you aren't hearing about are all the sites that have z/VM
5.2
> running with *no* problems; as stable as previous releases. Yes,
there
> are a *few* sites that are having stability problems, but we are
> addressing them rapidly and with good results.
>
> So at this point, no, we have no plan to extend service for z/VM 4.4,
but
> it is an interesting idea in any event, and it's something we'll think
> more about.
>
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott
>
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
