Yes, it was a huge stack of platters with the head that had to be withdrawn so that it could move up/down on a column to get to the correct platters. It then would move to the proper track. Seek times could be measured in seconds if the arm had to traverse from top to bottom or vice versa.

 

I just googled IBM 2305 and found a link to an IBM storage history page - http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storage/storage_photo.html . From the pictures, the 355, 1301, 1302, and 1405 show their 350 (the model number of the disk used in the RAMAC 305) heritage.  

 

 

Regards,

Richard Schuh

 

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency

 

Wasn't that the one with the single read/write head on an arm that would do a seek to the platter before it started going after the rec.  If I remember correctly, CE's would normally keep a big pan underneath to catch the constant drippings of hydraulic oil.  I remember something like that, altho it may have been the S/360 reincarnation of the 2nd generation drive, just as the 2311 bore a striking resemblance to a 1311.
Jim

At 02:34 PM 4/25/2006, you wrote:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C66896.F17B2D44
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID: A90797A4-37B9-4082-92BE-6647E3C1BC61
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
         charset="iso-8859-1"

And I thought I was the only one left that remembered the six foot tall disk
drive on the RAMAC 305.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [ mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency


 
 
Regards,
Richard Schuh
 
 
. Again, this is a HARDWARE restriction that goes back to the dark ages of
s/360.
 
 
Or farther. Anyone remember the disks used by the 1410 (the model number
escapes me, as do so many things of late) or the RAMAC 305? Besides, the
S/360 introduced "The Age of Enlightenment", didn't it?
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology




  _____ 

<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed 3894 VSE-List messages and set aside
2216 VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!   www.ellaforspam.com
< http://www.ellaforspam.com>    

------_=_NextPart_001_01C66896.F17B2D44
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID: F3A60029-5237-43CE-BF77-570CD74FF5E7
Content-Type: text/html;
         charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
And I=20 thought I was the only one left that remembered the six foot tall disk = drive on=20 the RAMAC 305.
 

-----Original Message-----

From: The IBM z/VM = Operating=20 System [ mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Schuh,=20 Richard

Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 PM

To:=20 [email protected]

Subject: Re: z/VM I/O=20 Concurrency

 

 

Regards,

Richard = Schuh

<= SPAN class=3DEmailStyle16>

 

. Again, this is=20 a HARDWARE restriction that goes back to the dark ages of=20 s/360.

 

 

Or farther. Anyone = remember the disks used=20 by the 1410 (the model number escapes me, as do so many things of late)=20 or the RAMAC 305? Besides, the S/360 introduced "The Age of = Enlightenment",=20 didn't it?

--

John=20 McKown

Senior Systems Programmer

HealthMarkets

Keeping the = Promise of=20 Affordable Coverage

Administrative Services Group

Information=20 Technology

 


<< ella for = "" Control >> has removed=20 3894 VSE-List messages and set aside 2216 VM-List = for="" me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  www.ellaforspam.com
------_=_NextPart_001_01C66896.F17B2D44--

Jim Bohnsack
Cornell Univ.
(607) 255-1760

Reply via email to