On Wed, 24 May 2006 18:15:18 -0400, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
wrote:

>On Wednesday, 05/24/2006 at 01:37 EST, Brian Nielsen
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've run some traces and know why DDR is abending.  If you don't want 
to
>> read the technical details below, the question is: Is this an APAR'abl
e
>> DDR problem or "user error caused by the HALT - don't do that"?
>
>Please open a PMR, Brian.  Because you asked so nicely ["he's such a
>*nice* boy"] and you have such helpful problem determination skills, we'
re
>inclined to treat it initially as a bug.  (And I'm not 100% certain, but
 I
>think it helps that the developer is also named Brian.]

Okay, will do.  (Honestly, though, my personal opinion is that usage note
 
1 for HALT probably applies: "1.  ATTENTION: Use this command only in 
extreme cases and after careful consideration.  Indiscriminate use of thi
s 
command may cause unwanted results.")

HALT causing DDR to abend is obviously an unwanted result.  :)

Maybe I'm getting a free pass because I'm not using it indiscriminatly.

>But I ask you, why can't everyone else include a nice detailed analysis 
of
>the problem in *their* problem descriptions?  I mean, it's not like in
>some alien language like Java or C++!  ;-)  [OCO modules excluded, of
>course]

OCO modules never stopped me!  Back in 1987 I wrote a disassembler in REX
X 
that processed TEXT decks and MODULES and created assembler source with 

labels.  Later on (1989) I used it to create a ZAP to the COBOL compiler 

to remove it's requirement for using an auxilary directory.  This allowed
 
COBOL to run from a minidisk whose directory had been saved in a DCSS wit
h 
SAVEFD.

Brian Nielsen

Reply via email to