On Thu, 25 May 2006 09:31:45 -0500, Lucius, Leland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Oh well. I guess IBM owns everything... :-) Actually, since no copyri
ght was
>attached to the article, I guess Alfred was within his rights to use it
freely,
>but to claim ownership???? That just seems wrong.
>
>Leland
>
I laughed when I read this. It appears they assert (repeatedly) copyright
on
nothing, too.
Someone shared with me once that a load module on z/OS for this C program
contains not fewer than 10 IBM copyright statements.
int TEST( void )
{ return(0); }
Probably the same on VM.
--
Gary Eheman
