Hi,
Is this still the current approach for testing LE maintenance?
I am applying UM31620 to MODULEs CEEBINIT, CEEBOICI, & CEEPIPI.
Or is there a better way?

BTW, the VMSES/E service guide seems to stay far, far away
from hints/tips on how to test various components other than
CMS (Appendix D). Seems sort of strange.
Thanks

-- 
Craig Dudley
Manager, Mainframe Technical Support Group
Office of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
603-271-1506    Fax 603-271-1516

>Mats,
>
>The simplest method of testing the LE code on the 49E disk is not the most
>elegant.  First,  ACCESS 49E earlier than the 19E Y-disk (I usually use
>filemode T).  After the ACCESS, NUCXLOAD the CEExxxxx MODULEs on the 49E
>disk.  If you are trying to test just serviced parts on the 49E disk, you
>only need to NUCXLOAD the newly built MODULEs, as the rest of the parts
>will be unchanged.
>When LE decides it needs to load a new routine, it first checks the NUCEXT
>chain to see if the code is already loaded.  If it is loaded, that code is
>used.  If it is not loaded, then LE tries a SEGMENT LOAD, followed by a
>LOADMOD of the part, followed by a LOAD from the GLOBAL LOADLIB list.
>
>Thanks!
>         Mike
>
>
>
>
>             "Westlund, Mats"
>             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>             .COM>                                                      To
>             Sent by: VM/ESA           [email protected]
>             and z/VM                                                   cc
>             Discussions
>             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                     Subject
>             .UARK.EDU>                LE Testing
>
>
>             03/29/2004 03:09
>             AM
>
>
>             Please respond to
>              VM/ESA and z/VM
>                Discussions
>
>
>
>
>
>
>How can I test Language Environment fixes from the 49E disk to see if they
>work before saving new segments.
>I only want to use the files on the 49E disk and not pick up things from
>the "old" segments.
>
>
>Regards Mats Westlund

Reply via email to