Hello, VM experts,

I'm preparing myself for teaching the mysteries of VSE and VM systems work and I'm reminded that when one prepares to teach something one discovers many holes and uncertainties in one's own knowledge. Today I thought I'd educate myself about IPL bootstrap records in case one of my students asks about them. My theory, which I wanted to test, was that they're written by ICKDSF whenever an INIT is done (for MVS and VSE volumes) or a CPVOL FORMAT is done (for VM volumes). Based on what I've seen today, this seems to be true.

But while looking around our system I discovered a volume that had originally been created for VSE use as a full-pack minidisk. In other words, it had been prepared using ICKDSF INIT (which would have created a vtoc). However, somewhere along the way it was decided that this volume would have several minidisks on it. In other words, it was no longer to be a full-pack minidisk. CPVOL FORMAT was never used on this volume, so cylinder 0 was left unchanged, with no allocation information. (If it were to have allocation information, it would have been PERM for the whole volume.) My initial reaction was surprise, but then I figured that possibly CP can tolerate a volume without allocation information as long as its sole use is PERM. It sure seems to be true that such a volume needs only a VOL1 label to make CP happy.

My question is this: is there any reason to be concerned about such a volume not having an allocation map?

    - Tom

P.S. The IPL bootstrap records are different between VSE and VM, but since we're not IPLing using this volume, that isn't an issue.


Tom Cluster
County of Sonoma
Santa Rosa, CA
(707) 565-3384 (Tuesdays and Wednesdays only)

Reply via email to