I am not sure if anyone can give me any advice on this.
Between our VM systems we use TCPNJE for RSCS links. This leaves us with only a few links to MVS using SNANJE. (Our MVS people expect to have TCPNJE support installed in Q1/Q2 next year).
All terminal traffic to VM is now migrated to TCPIP so VM/VTAM is a **VERY** expensive product for just these few remaining links to MVS.
As an interim measure for the next year we have defined some ESCON CTC links (BCTC) between MVS & VM & are trying to get non-SNA NJE links working.
The link is defined and connects successfully. I can also route traffic over it successfully. However we do see a small but increasing error count on the link.
The problem comes when I close the SNA link so that all the traffic goes over the NJE line in both directions. After a while we get DMTNTR930E message (reason code 0000) denying the request to start stream 1 and a file sits blocking the link until action is taken.
Buffer sizes on both sides are the same (but a bit small at 520). It will take some weeks to get a JES restart on the MVS side to change this.
Is there anything I can do (or any parameters I can change) to make this more reliable - or is it just the nature of the beast?
Colin Allinson
Amadeus Data Processing
- RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (Non-SNA) Colin Allinson
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (Non-SNA) Dennis Schaffer
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (Non-SNA) Colin Allinson
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (Non-... Dennis Schaffer
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (... Colin Allinson
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic ... Dennis Schaffer
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (... Jim Bohnsack
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic ... Colin Allinson
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic ... Jim Bohnsack
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic ... Jim Bohnsack
- Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC (Non-SNA) Jim Bohnsack
