On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 23:08:58 +0200, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w rote:
>On 7/4/06, Phil Smith III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Question for the IBMers: have they been officially renamed to "discontiguous SHARED segments", or is the name of this Redbook technical ly wrong? > >What do you think the full name would be then? We have Named Saved >Systems and Discontiguous Shared Segments as far as I know. > Sorry Rob, DCSS stood (and still stands) for discontiguous saved segments . The term "shared segment" is what people in the street talk about, but it doesn't exist as object in the VM books. What is a valid sentence: a saved segment can contain a shared segment an d an exclusive segment, for shared and exclusive pages respectively. Kris P.S. I know this as ages ago I searched some VM book index for "shared segment" and didn't find a match.
