That's quit possibly the situation, Mary Anne. here's a follow up article:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060712/D8IQLV780.html
DJ
Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
By sensitive, perhaps they meant classified. The article stated that at
was an unclass
network that was hit. So no classified info was stolen. So what info was
stolen? We don't know yet.
MA
On 7/12/06, *Dave Jones* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
This can't be good:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060712/D8IQ6MHG0.html
I can't understand how they can say (in para. 3) that no sensitive U.S.
government information was compromised, but then in para. 6 state:
"Asked what information was stolen by the hackers, Cooper said, "Because
the investigation is continuing, I don't think we even know."
Our U.S. tax $$$ at work....:-(
DJ