Is there a more elegant way to do the following PIPE structure: 'PIPE (ENDCHAR ?)',
... /* some stream of records */ '| p: PICK ... '| t: TAKE ... ... /* only the records that pass all the filters come here */ '?', 't:', '| f: FANINANY', ... /* all the records that were filtered out come here */ '?', 'p:', '| f:' What irks me is needing the last 3 lines. As more filters get added more of these trivial connections are required. I'd really like to be able to connect the secondary output streams from multiple stages in the same pipe (in this case PICK and TAKE) directly to the pipe that collects the rejected records (in this case the pipe with FANINANY). If I read the PIPE syntax correctly there's no alternative, but I'm hoping I've overlooked some technique. Brian Nielsen
