And while you're at it, repeal the law of gravity, so that I don't have to worry about weight gain from eating too much 'chocolate chocolate chip' ice cream.
-----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: July 14, 2006 12:26 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/VM v5.2 - Common Criteria - Order Questions > > > "There can only be one." > > > > (sigh) "There can be only one." > > > > Alan > > Now that reminds me of Mr Gilmore's postings on the Assembler list. > Please explain the difference for the gramatically challenged? The first is an exclusionary statement -- only one CAN exist. The second is a wish for the situation to be otherwise -- Alan would like there to be more than one (ostensibly so he could be in more than one place at a time). Repeal the law of simultaneity! Matter should be free to exist in multiple places at the same time! Free the bound variables! -- db The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The integrity and security of this message cannot by guaranteed on the Internet. The Sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, or for the consequences of any actions taken on basis of the information provided. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This disclaimer is the property of the TTC and must not be altered or circumvented in any manner.
