Folks,
A suggestion I'd like to make on behalf of the Digest Readers to help 
maintain the Signal-to-Noise ration on the list as high as conveniently 

possible ...

When you're replying via email to a post and quoting the original message
, 
if possible, could you please review the quoted material and prune out an
y 
noise - in particular any now-redundant / duplicate lengthy legal 
disclaimers attached to the quoted material. (I'm even tempted to suggest
 
getting in the habit of defaulting to NOT quoting original message as an 

appendage - but that's maybe a bit TOO radical for some ... <grin>)

If you can then I think that it'd help a little to avoid my problem of 

occasionally missing a, "nugget" because I was, "scrolling dross" and wen
t 
a little too far.

I'm not asking anyone to, "Do the impossible" - we all have to live with 

Company Rules on these things - just, "if you can" ... :-)

With thanks in anticipation,
Jeff Gribbin

Reply via email to