On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
If no one opens a PMR, it doesn't get fixed.  (Stop me if I start
repeating myself.)  If no one calls it in, and the problem has been in
existence for multiple releases, then the pressure to fix it in the "next"
release is non-existent.  It is frowned upon for us to open an APAR
without a customer PMR.

Fair enough. I am, of course, reluctant to open a PMR until I am pretty sure that it's the fault of the VM side o' things. And from what I can see...it may be the fault of the client not attempting SSL on the data.

Right, and to initiate an SSL handshake on the data connection.

Yeah, that's what:
Thread Client_Socket_Address Server_Socket_Address Connection Cipher
1      192.168.253.18:50429     192.168.131.1:1075       1012       NONE

Makes me suspicious of.

Your trace indicates that your client is tried to use in-band FTP security techniques. Have you confirmed that it is performing an SSL handshake on
the data connection?

This is the bit that I'm suspecting. So, let's try a different tactic: what FTP clients are known to do implicit SSL the *right* way for the VM stack? If I can get one of *those* working, then it's clear that the problem is in my client, not in the SSL implementation or VM's handling of it.

Adam

Reply via email to