Be careful with how you define the MAXDEVS.  It will have an effect on
your ability to do dynamic IO gen changes.  I agree that the HSA has
gotten a lot bigger than it was.  IBM's answer is it has to be bigger to
support all the new stuff.


Paul Feller 
AIT Mainframe Technical Support 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(319)-355-7824 


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: HSA size question

I kept the LPARs but I really cut down on the OSA adapters.

We have 4 OSA cards.

2 that supports the ICC devices
2 that supports are normal network traffic

When I defined all the addresses and then gave all addresses to all 4
lpars.

Now, all the addresses on the DS6800 are on all LPARs, but I also cut
back to what we would realistically use, not the max that we could
define for the DS6800.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/16/2006 4:14 PM >>>
Did you cut back your HSA by removing LPARs, reducing MAXDEVS, or both?

Mostly I want to verify that MAXDEVS impacts HSA size.

Brian Nielsen

On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:33:43 -0500, Tom Duerbusch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I do believe that it is the max devices defined, but that is also 
>across LPARs.
>
>What initially bit me, was I defined 4 lpars.  Why?  I don't know.  I 
>needed two, a 390 and an IFL.  But I thought about a test one and 
>perhaps a "systems" one.  And the convention was to define the devices 
>to all LPARs.  Well, almost 2 GB for HSA convinced me otherwise.  Even 
>if I didn't bring up the LPAR, the definitions took their pound of HSA,

>hence real storage.
>
>I cut things back to the minimum of 768M HSA size.
>
>I remember when OS/VS 2 took 768K for the superviser.  Is the HSA 
>process 1,000 times more complex then OS/VS 2?
>
>Tom Duerbusch
>THD Consulting
>
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/16/2006 2:32 PM >>>
>On a z/890, does the size of the HSA change if the value of the MAXDEVS
>
>parameter on the RESOURCE statement in the IOCP is increased/decreased?
>
>The z/890 System Oveview manuals says the HSA size varies according to
>
>the "size and complexity of the I/O configuration", but it's not clear 
>if it refers to the actual defined devices or the maximum devices that 
>can be defined.  It makes the most sense for it to be the maximum 
>devices, but
>
>I'd like to verify it.
>
>Brian Nielsen
>=======================================================================
>==

Reply via email to