Re: real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

[David Kreuter]

Title: RE: [IBMVM] real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

try setting the adapter number on the LINK statements to be the same: Both 0s or both 1s
David

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Ron Greve
Sent: Sun 9/10/2006 5:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] real ctc vs vctc on tcp/ip

>could you post your DEVICE/LINK pair  from PROFILE TCPIP?
>David

To simplify testing we set up a second tcp/ip in the second
lpar and connected the two over a real ctc.  We saw the same
failures as we saw by using SLES in the second lpar.

lpar one
----------
attach 448 tcpip 720
attach 449 tcpip 721

lpar two
----------
attach 508 tcpip 720
attach 509 tcpip 721

>
;  lpar one tcp/ip device/link
DEVICE CTCVDEV4 CTC 720
LINK CTCVLNK4 CTC 1 CTCVDEV4

;  lpar two   tcp/ip device/link
DEVICE CTCVDEV4  CTC 0720
LINK   CTCVLNK4 CTC 0 CTCVDEV4  MTU 1500