On 9/19/06, Colin Allinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your example seems just what I need (although I found that I needed DIAG064).
I would be surprised. I seem to recall it does not get the argument of the diag64 into the SMF record, which was one of the reasons we had to do it differently. The other was that we did not want RACF to waste time on each diag64 (we had a lot of those because of some incompatible developer). Rob
