> As for the VM:Secure thing, I find that simply documenting how the product can screw > up a system is not only an unacceptable answer, it borders on repugnance. A > strategic product that should always be working should never violate the integrity > of the system. There is no justification for it. The changed allocation on the disk > must be respected. Reallocating a disk is a normal maintenance activity.
I'll second this comment. This is a serious bug impacting system integrity. Documenting the bug is not an acceptable response. -- db
