i hope your choice in products doesn't come down to one variable.
However, this is shared pages, meaning DCSS and NSS pages. 9400
seems very reasonable. If you look at the ESASTR1 display and
report, it shows capture ratio. The reason i like reporting
capture ratio is to know if somebody is hiding something, and to
make sure we know numbers add up. I usually see capture ratios
for storage about 99%, meaning no numbers are orders of magnitude
out of whack. I would find it interesting if you really have
2.4M pages shared, or about 10GB. This would be a most
interesting system to analyze further....
But, a bit of a further note, on z/vm 5.2, ibm broke this field.
So we corrected it in esamap and esamon. So guess you could say
PTK is reporting bad information correctly? You choose which has
value.
