> Could this "Virtual San" be some modification of the Shared/Byte File > System > server?
Biggest gotcha there is that the IUCV protocol that drives those SFS/BFS servers isn't published anywhere, which would make it hard to implement for non-IBM systems or mostly OCO systems, eg Linux or z/OS. > With IPGATE, that could even be used across LPARs via hypersockets > and > across physical machines via other TCPIP connections. Someday it'd be real nice if IPGATE was folded into the base VM. It's far too useful a tool not to be available to everyone.
