On Thursday, 03/01/2007 at 02:16 EST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > With the loss of the Flex 64-bit capability for general > > > use.... > > Sorry to nitpick, but I don't believe there has ever been a FLEX > 64-bit > > capability for general use. > > I'd say that the unavailability of the 64 bit FLEX *is* the loss I'm > talking about.
I just wanted it clear that 64-bit FLEX is not now, and has never been, available for general use. To the uninitiated your statement was ambiguous. You have clarified your meaning of the word "loss" and I am a happy camper now. :-) Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
