While I do use a different name for my PPF file (POL PPF), I think the important thing to change is the *component* name.
IBM has CP in ZVM (do you really use those long complicated base PPF names?), so I could have CPTYPE1 CPTYPE2 etc. Or, as I really do have: CPTEST CPPROD. (Since I am using a different PPF name I also allowed myself a component named CP). Shimon On 22 Mar 2007 at 13:15, Alan Altmark wrote: > On Thursday, 03/22/2007 at 12:40 AST, David Kreuter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why do you endorse circumventing ppf override? > > If the override can be a different name that the base, that's ok. You > don't want to end up with a modified (via overrides) 5VMCPRxx PPF, as > that would mess up the "real" CP builds. You want something like > "NORACF PPF". > > I last created a PPF override some 10 years ago and I'm too lazy to > look it up in the book. :-) > > Alan Altmark > z/VM Development > IBM Endicott -- ********************************************************************** ** Shimon Lebowitz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] VM System Programmer . Israel Police National HQ. http://www.poboxes.com/shimonpgp Jerusalem, Israel phone: +972 2 542-9877 fax: 542-9308 ********************************************************************** **
