And, as I recall, there were problems going from VM/ESA 2.2 to some
later z/VM releases, like 4.2; we had to go to 2.4 before we could get
4.2 to come up second-level. I don't know if 3.1 would have the same
problems coming from 2.2.
(Anybody got "Bingo!" yet on their releases Bingo card?)
Nick
Stephen Frazier wrote:
z/VM 5.x must run in a 64-bit machine. As I recall the first VM that
supported 64-bit virtual machines was 3.1. So z/VM 5.3 running as a
guest would need to be on a 3.1 or higher VM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually:
Can you bring it up under VM 2.2
( I was thinking no, but I don't find anything on the VM web page)
