Probably what has happened is a locally written service routine (REXX)
was running and waiting for an SMSG to come in.  When the first SMSG
came in, it dropped its IUCV interface - so subsequent SMSGs were
rejected.
 
I typically use the WAKEUP MODULE to collect SMSGs.  It loads as a
nucleus extension, so even when the host program is off doing other
things WAKEUP stays resident and continues to collect subsequent IUCV
msgs, which can be processed whenever it is convenient for the host
program.
 
I know a lot of people are using the PIPE STARMSG stage to process IUCV
messages these days, but does that stay resident to collect SMSGs after
the PIPE terminates and passes control to the host program?
 
-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dixon, Patricia A
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible Causes of HCPMFS057I



Hi Mike

 

I am not a VM expert by any means, but here goes:  

 

A user issues 3 SMSG commands to a disconnected machine.  This service
machine has the ability to send files (monitor and account data) to MVS
or write files to a users CMS disk.  The SMSG issues a TRANSFER to the
service machine providing the file names and their locations.  In this
instance, the files are being written to a CMS disk.  

 

The first SMSG command executes successfully, but the second and third
get the HCPMFS057I message.  

 

>From what I am seeing in other responses on the LISTSERV, it looks like
a VMCF AUTHORIZE issue.  

 

Thanks

 

 


  _____  


From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible Causes of HCPMFS057I

 


Pat, 

If you haven't figured it out by now, could you provide a little more
detail?   
E.g. 
1- On what userid are the messages appearing? 
2- What command was issued on that ID, or what product/application is
running on that ID? 
3- Given some of the previous replies, on that ID and the command's
target ID; what is the response to: CP Query SET 
4- In the directory entry for that userid and the target userid, what
are the OPTION record settings? 
5- Can anyone else issue the same commands/run the same product/app? 
6- Has this every worked before? 

Mike Walter                                                         
Hewitt Associates                                                   
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates. 




"Pat Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <[email protected]> 

07/31/2007 06:51 AM 


Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <[email protected]>


To

[email protected] 


cc

 


Subject

Possible Causes of HCPMFS057I

 


 

 




Receiving a HCPMFS057I User not authorizied.  Checked the help facility 

but no reasonable explanation found other than "not authorized The user
i
s 
not authorized." 

What could cause this error or what is it that the user does not have 
authorization?  

Thanks  




  _____  


The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately
alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including
any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the
contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited. 

Reply via email to