OK, now you confused me. By virtue of the fact that it has 2 VCPUs in
an 11 RCPU environment, would it not automatically be capped at 18.18%
because it cannot get more than two CPUs?
Or, did you mean 2.5% and not 25%?
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Vincent
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 9:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SET SHARE RELATIVE
I certainly did not want to cause confusion - this is why I said
" There is actually more science..." I was passing on what we learned
through trial, error and then a phone call. And blast it, you are
indeed correct Kris.
On a system with 11 IFLs and a 2 vcpu guest that we needed to
cap at 25%, we had to set its share as SET SHARE RELATIVE 200 ABSOLUTE
2.3% LIMITHARD. This is the only way we could successfully get the
server to not go over 25% cpu total.
In our case, the linux guests are all multi-processor apps and
none are multi-vcpu uniprocessor apps so the behavior was as expected,
the apps got up to 25% (and not 12.5% if they were uniprocessing)
The answer is I guess "It Depends" since you will really need to
know your applications and how they run in order to set the SHARE the
way you really need it. I was trying to keep it "simple" - ha!
Jim
On 8/3/07, Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim, I'd say your append can introduce confusion.
The vcpus still count for absolute shares. But, indeed,
the number of real CPUs come into account: the % written on the SET
SHAER command is expressed as a % of the whole system.
If you have 10 CPU's, a SET SHARE ABS 5% LIMITHARD means
that a uniprocessor guest can consume 50% of one CPU. If the guest has
two virtual processors, each one can consume 25% at most. This is very
important if this guest would run one heavy uniprocessing task, this
task will have a hard time to get more than 25% of a CPU. We learned
this the hard way when installing a 6 engine 9672 ages ago (our heavy
process was a VM DB2 server)
--------------------------------------------------------
This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated,
this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment
products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any
transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable
law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC)
traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each
sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived,
supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are
located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This
message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill Lynch you
consent to the foregoing.
--------------------------------------------------------