And to satisfy those installations that are not as simplistic as mine, an ESM
implementation could allow an installation to turn it off and use all of the
old authorizations just as they are today.
Wow, Chuckie must have a distant cousin around here who typed at my keyboard. I
don't think I have ever leaned toward implementing something in the ESM when it
could be done in CP.
/Tom Kern
--- Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 08/24/2007 at 04:26 EDT, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I like it.
> >
> > Are you thinking of having this as a CP implementation or an ESM based
> > add-on function? I would not object to either but prefer a CP
> implementation.
>
> I'm not thinking of any particular implementation, I'm just asking for
> opinions on the concept of "implied consent". But now that you ask, what
> I've described so far is doable within CP as well as an ESM, though the
> ESM provides more flexibility and "exceptions" capability.
>
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
