My customer has 18 VM systems...
A problem with managing many VM systems is that operators need to see that
there is a problem.  Problems can go away automatically too (e.g. a queue on
a RSCS link).  We had a central VM:OPER console where problems got listed as
HOLDMSG, and these messages can be removed when the automation procedures
detect the problem is gone, so problems need a unique identifier.  The
standard HOLDMSG procedure is not good enough for this, so we started an
extra VM:OPER process that grabs our own HOLDMSG/REMOVEMSG messages.
But, even then it was not perfect yet.  So, I wrote a CMS/GUI application
with a screen where all important problems are displayed, VM systems can get
green/yellow/red state, depending on the worst message for that system.  It
is an RxServer based server that collects the messages and maintains the
system states; the CMS/GUI is only the nice front-end.  Each message there
has a severity and a key too, plus timing information.  The key allows
processes to set and remove the problem state (hence remove the message when
the problem is gone), the timing info (when present) can make that the
message goes automatically away after that many minutes (eg if you measure
an RSCS queue every 5 minutes, you code "6 minutes" as timing info; the key
could be "linkeid%QUEUE": our server then knows that it will remove the
problem with that key if after 6 minutes there is no new message arrived for
"linkid%QUEUE"
To the key, operator help information can be linked so that with a double
mouse click the operator can see what he has to do to fix the problem.  More
information as well as the code can be sent.

2007/8/29, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  Thanks, Mike. I had not seen your previous post before I responded to
> Bob.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Mike Walter
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:30 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: OPERATOR Consoles
>
>
>
> Yep, again.  See "Chapter 10".
>
> Mike Walter
>  ------------------------------
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *  From: *"Schuh, Richard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *  Sent: *08/29/2007 04:30 PM
> *  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *  Subject: *Re: OPERATOR Consoles
>
>
>
> I was thinking more along the lines of operating all systems from one
> terminal.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Bob Bates
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:28 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: OPERATOR Consoles
>
>
>
> Sure. If you can logon to the system, VM:Operator can have a console
> there. The OPERATOR id can be anywhere. Authorized users can be defined to
> logon and run VMYIAMOP to get a copy of the console. The definition of the
> user within VM:Operator says what screens the user can see and what commands
> if any they can execute.
>
>
>
> Bob Bates
> Enterprise Hosting Services - z/VM and 
> z/Linux<http://ehs.homestead.wellsfargo.com/C1/MOBS/WebPart%20Pages/zVM.aspx>
> w. (972) 753-5967
> c. (214) 907-5071
>
> *"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
> or any information herein.  If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message.  Thank you for your cooperation."*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Schuh, Richard
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:22 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* OPERATOR Consoles
>
> In the not too distant future, we will possibly have VM systems scattered
> almost as widely as we have datacenters. What products are available that
> would allow the operations of these systems to be handled from a single
> location, if such exist? For example, can VM:Operator be used across a span
> of 2000 miles in the continental US? Between the US and Japan? Are there
> other products that can do the job?
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh
>  ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
> may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
> attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of
> this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
> prohibited.
>



-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support

Reply via email to