Thanks, Alan. Yes, it is possible they were thinking of TSAF, which is not running in all of the VMs involved. Hence, I used ISFC.
David Wakser -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 1:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Defining virtual CTCAs On Wednesday, 10/10/2007 at 10:37 EDT, "Wakser, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, that was what I thought. But I received an answer from someone at > IBM (regarding a DITTO problem between nodes) that indicated that a > virtual CTC would work. I believe that person must have been mistaken, > because I cannot see how! So, I approached the list for verification! They were probably thinking of TSAF rather than ISFC. Since TSAF runs in a virtual machine you can connect it to a 2nd-level VM. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
