On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:43:28 -0600, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >These responses are asynchronous to the command itself... Just how long >would you like the pipe to wait to be sure it has captured all the messages >produced by a command? There are no immediate responses to your secuser >commands, as indicated by the fact that the pipe found none.
Hmmm...the manual doesn't list the responses as being delayed responses (like it does for FLASHCOPY). If they really are delayed responses it should be properly documented. >Now, if you want to set up IUCV and message trapping, then you'd have a >party... In the larger scheme of things I'm partying with STARMSG to trap the console traffic from the target userid after the SECUSER is established. Brian Nielsen
