José
Do you have all z/VM LE service applied? There have been some problems in
the past with
z/VM LE and DB/2. One such fix is
APAR: VM63885
PTF: UM31625
Description: VAGEN Z/VM 4.4 LE U4036-02 ACCESSING DB2 UDB ON LINUX
SERVER
I believe there are also some DB/2 PTFs which may correct some problems in
this area as well.
Unfortunately, I do not have a list of those APARs/PTFs.
Please make certain you have the lastest z/VM LE 0702RSU applied and the
SCEE and SCEEX
segments resaved. If the problem persists, you should open a PMR and we
can treat this as a
new problem.
Thanks!
Mike Donovan - z/VM CMS and LE Development and Service
Jose Raul Baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a.es> To
Sent by: The IBM [email protected]
z/VM Operating cc
System
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> LE problem when RUNNING PROGRAM
UNKNOWN - PJBR
11/26/2007 01:11
PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM
Operating System
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARK.EDU>
Hi list,
We are having a problem on a COBOL/VM application attacking a DB2/Linux
database scenario at a certain point. It doesn't occur constantly but still
it's a situation we must fix.
ARI0717I Start SQLINIT EXEC: 11/26/07 14:31:00 MAI.
ARI6042I Warning: Application server LNXGES has not been
generated on this processor. Ignore this
message if the server has been defined as a
global resource on another processor.
ARI0320I The default server name is LNXGES.
ARI0796I End SQLINIT EXEC: 11/26/07 14:31:00 MAI
Bienvenido al programa ELARUN EXEC !!
CEE0374C CONDITION = CEE3250C TOKEN = 00040CB2 61C3C5C5 00000000
WHILE RUNNING PROGRAM UNKNOWN
AT THE TIME OF INTERRUPT
PSW 00000000 00000000
GPR 0-3 000000F8 00F80000 00002398 0000002F
GPR 4-7 00F37FFE 00000001 00000001 01FFFCC4
GPR 8-B 00000000 01FFF7E8 00000004 01FFF000
GPR C-F 01071950 01FFF904 810723E8 00F52130
FLT 0-2 43E1000000000000 4E00000003B0FEE0
FLT 4-6 4E00000000025E87 0000000001839560
CMS
We really can't imagine what the cause of it could be. I have found out
that
this machine is the only one with 32M defined in the VM directory. I have
equaled it to the rest of the machines (the rest don't get this message) at
64M just in case that this might help. Yet I'm not very confident in this
solution.
Could anybody help, please ?
Thanks in advance,
Saludos,
José R. Barón
Dpto. Sistemas
CALCULO S. A.
Tel. 91 330 86 44
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
