It has always been the case that for a given system (e.g. z9), there is one
and only one LPAR that should place the IOCP online; and only one LPAR that
should be doing dynamic IOCP changes.  This is somehow enforced by that
"tokens" are used, and when z/OS is the master, a VM LPAR can no longer do
dynamic changes.  This is not related to z/VM having access to the IOCP
source or not.

As fa as I know, HCP can even create IOCPs for other systems than the LPAR
it runs on; in that case, it is useful to ship the IOCP source created by
HCD to a VM on another system and use the IOCP command to place it online
there.

2007/12/3, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  Our I/O configuration is done completely via z/OS. The only downside I
> can see to it is that z/VM can't dynamically add devices, since it has no
> access to the source.
>
> --
>    .~.    Robert P. Nix             Mayo Foundation
>    /V\    RO-OE-5-55              200 First Street SW
>  / ( ) \  507-284-0844           Rochester, MN 55905
> ^^-^^   -----
> "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but     "Join the story...
> Ride Ural."
>  in practice, theory and practice are different."
>
>
>
>
> On 12/3/07 9:09 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do not have personal knowledge of this, but I believe the answer is a
> resounding YES. In fact, attempting to use both z/OS HCD and z/VM HCD on the
> same box could result in major grief. Choose one, and stick to it.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>
> *On Behalf Of *Hilliard, Chris
> *Sent:* December 3, 2007 10:06
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* HCD question
>
> I'm currently installing z/VM 5.3.  I have two other LPARs on this box
> running z/OS 1.4 and z/OS 1.7.  Can I maintain (either temporarily or
> permanently) my hardware/software configuration for the z/VM LPAR using HCD
> under z/OS?  I have a huge learning curve ahead of me and not having to
> learn z/VM's HCD would lighten my load a bit.
>
> Any words of wisdom from the community?
>
> Thanks in advance…Chris
>
> ------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material.  Any review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking
> of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
> than the intended recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited.  If you
> received this in error please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.  The integrity and security of this message cannot by
> guaranteed on the Internet.  The Sender accepts no liability for the content
> of this e-mail or for the consequences of any actions taken on basis of the
> information provided.  The recipient should check this e-mail and any
> attachments for the presence of viruses.  The sender accepts no liability
> for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.  This
> disclaimer is the property of the TTC and must not be altered or
> circumvented in any manner.
>
>
>


-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support

Reply via email to