My guess is that the deactivation is happening asynchronously in RSCS, hence the delay in the last response.
2008/1/16, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Given a pipe that uses starmsg to trap replies and issues the command > 'CP SMSG RSCS (ML.RSCHUH STOP V207' > The reply that comes back is a multi-line response, in order of > arrival: > > 00000001RSCS RSCS 0154 0001 DEVVM MIKE M1L Link V207 autostart > disabled > 00000001RSCS RSCS 0001 0002 DEVVM MIKE M1L End of command > response > 00000001RSCS RSCS 0002 0001 DEVVM MIKE M1L Link V207 > deactivated > > It seems that there is a reversal in order of the last two lines. Is this > normal and documented somewhere? V207 is an LPR printer. > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
