That is a good question. From the way things were presented, it appears
to be a tool that runs on the server. I have enough work on my plate
that I am going to let this rest until someone brings it up again,
hopefully in a forum where I am in attendance. 

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Security Scans
> 
> Richard,
> How does the tool work?  If it's one of those that probes the 
> site from outside, just let them run it.  If it's supposed to 
> run on the system with the web server, let them try to run 
> it.  Whose fault is it that it won't execute?  Not yours.  
> You could even offer to send your files to a system where the 
> tool will run, so they can be scanned.  The results will be 
> meaningless, but you will have satisfied the edict.
> 
>                                                        Dennis 
> 
> "The popularity and effectiveness of modern anti-depressants 
> is one of the great challenges of contemporary dramaturgy.  
> We no more want Willy Loman to solve his problems with Prozac 
> than we want Stanley and Stella Kowalski to get 
> air-conditioning."  -- Playwriting 101
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:34
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Security Scans
> 
> It is not that I want to test the site, it is that a 
> committee has specified that the same tool be used for all 
> platforms. This was chiseled in granite before anyone 
> associated with a mainframe even heard that it was being 
> considered. Now that the edict has been made, rules is rules.
> 
> Don't confuse the domain name of my e-mail with either that 
> of the VM system or the real production network. They are 
> quite different from each other. The VM system really is not 
> that interesting of a target for several reasons which I will 
> not go into here. It might be tempting, but would be fruitless.
> 
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh 
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Boltz
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:14 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Security Scans
> > 
> > 
> > Of course, that also depends on how tempting the target is. 
> > Given the domain name of your e-mail, I would guess the 
> target is very 
> > tempting indeed...
> > 
> 

Reply via email to